You’ve composed some awesome songs and found the right musicians to lay them down to track. You’ve spent countless hours at the console to ensure that the right sound you’ve had in your head is not lost in translation.
As a producer, I know first hand that this is not an easy process. Sometimes the initial instrument track was not set up to capture exactly what you wanted (an example is mic placement on the drums). It was a great performance, but the snare was weak. You try to go after that in the mix down by triggering drum samples over the original snare (drum replacement technique) to get that fatness you originally wanted. I’ve been there.
So when you finally have the right mix, you finish the process and burn a CD. Wow, sounds good, doesn’t it? Now your ready to let those tracks loose and let everyone hear ‘em.
What? The reaction was not what you expected? Are the songs not as good as what you really thought? Yes, this is a subjective matter, however don’t jump to conclusions just yet.
I’ve written, what I feel are some great tunes. I’ve entered many national and international song contests and I’ve been fortunate to reach the top-tier in many of them. I’ve received positive feedback from major songwriters on the quality of my songwriting. Other artist’s have recorded my songs, some of which reached the top 10 on various Internet charts. I’ve worked on corporate projects and have gotten rave reviews on the results. From the evidence, it seems like I might be on to something.
But you know what? The lack of support from people (ironically, more from people I know) can be disheartening. I mean, you know you have a good song, but it doesn’t seem to be doing anything to the listener at that moment. What’s the problem? Does the song suck? Is it just not their thing?
I’ve had the chance to speak to other songwriters about this same subject. Not just average ones — very good songwriters – and they often reciprocate my thoughts. Why is this?
I have few theories. Mind you, they are theories. Let me start by saying I’m not talking about the level of songwriting that some of those beginning contestants bring in front of the American Idol judges. “I’m a great singer and I write songs – just ask my mom.” You know the type.
So, on with my theories. These are my thoughts.
People expect a quality recording, period.
These days, recording music is easier to do. Where it used to take a major budget to go into a commercial recording studio and sound good – bands and musicians are doing the same thing at home. As a result, it’s easy to produce music — quality music and upload it to the Internet quickly.
It’s no longer difficult to produce a professional sounding CD. In fact, it has now become the norm. And that is my point. People now expect a great sounding CD, even on the local level. 15 years ago, that was not the case. A great sounding CD from a band on the local level was actually impressive.
A band on every corner
Now, don’t
get me wrong. There has always been competition in the music business, but the playing field has changed dramatically during the last 15 to 20 years. There are a lot of good bands out there. Yes, I don’t negate all the crap — but people expect greatness, even from local bands. The Internet makes it possible for a local act to compete on a global scale. I could have never imagined this when I started out in 1983.
Technology has made it possible for musicians to sound exceptional on stage. Years ago, it wasn’t easy for a band to cover all the parts on their records. Both guitarists and keyboardists now have the gear to handle anything in concert.
I was watching Paul McCartney the other day on VH1 Classic. He was playing Red Square in Russia and man, did it sound good. All the horn and string parts that the Beatles used years ago, were replaced by a couple keyboards, that actually sounded better.
Music overload
Growing up, there were 3 places I could get music from:
- Record Stores (which are dead as we know it).
- Kmart (This was before Wal-Mart had a major presence)
- Record Clubs (Columbia and BMG).
This was it. There was no Internet and MTV had only just started to break out nationally in 1983. There was radio – and that was even very different back in those days. But radio and the record companies were tight (not saying this was a good thing). That’s all changing now.
In addition, the only way I could get any information about a band I liked, is to get one of the old rock magazines like Cream (it has drastically changed since those days) or maybe be lucky enough to catch a band on Don Kirshner’s Rock Concert. There was a mystique to bands and musician’s in that time. Bands actually had careers last more than one album.
Now, Information is readily available on any band or artist aligned with both video and audio. There are hundreds of ways to access music. There are sub-genres of sub-genres! We are saturated with possibilities.
So there you go. Definitely a debatable subject and I welcome all comments. I think the main point I want to emphasize is that just because your music doesn’t seem to be grabbing people immediately, doesn’t mean it’s not good. Record companies are famous for the “that doesn’t really do much for me” comment. It’s a primitive attitude. And, in my opinion, it’s one of the reasons why great (and yes, often viable) music gets a pass. It’s also why everything tends to sound the same in a specific genre.
True, a good song is timeless. I more than agree. But, with the influx of all available music out there, it’s not always easy to get people to catch on. The music loving public has become numb with a massive amount of choices and a hundred ways to get it. Expectations are high. It’s not easy to impress people anymore.
Who is your biggest fan? You. Sounds a bit arrogant, and definitely subjective, but you have to be true to what you do. Music mogul Russell Simmons has always stood by this mantra: Do You!
Looking ahead
Promotional strategies have to be more cutting edge than they used to be. The competition is more than just intense, it’s insane. For every Maroon 5, I’ll give you 10 bands that sound just as good. How do you compete? How can you stand out as a band?
Fortunately, there is a reason why there are sub-genres of sub-genres. It’s because there are people out there who support them. Might be a small piece of the pie, but it’s a fan base waiting to happen – you just might not have tapped into yet.







Thanks for the perspective, Hugh. Very valid points and somehow just what I needed to read today! Keep up the good work. I’m a fan of your voice series too, btw.
Hey Juliet. I wrote this post one day out of frustration — but I know it resonates with so many composers. Appreciate your kind comments and glad you like the voice series. I’m always open to suggestions on topics to write about, as I want to write about the things my readers are interested in.